首页> 外文OA文献 >Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the German version of the dizziness handicap inventory
【2h】

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the German version of the dizziness handicap inventory

机译:德语版本头昏障碍清单的翻译,跨文化适应性和可靠性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To translate the Dizziness Handicap Inventory into German (DHI-G) and investigate reliability, assess the association between selected items of the University of California Los Angeles Dizziness Questionnaire and the DHI-G, and compare the scores of patients and healthy participants. STUDY DESIGN:: Cross-sectional design. SETTING:: Tertiary center for vertigo, dizziness, or balance disorders. PATIENTS:: One hundred forty-one patients with vertigo, dizziness, and unsteadiness associated with a vestibular disorder, with a mean age (standard deviation) of 51.5 (13.2) years, and 52 healthy individuals participated. INTERVENTIONS:: Fourteen patients participated in the cognitive debriefing; 127 patients completed the questionnaires once or twice within 1 week. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: The DHI-G assesses disability caused by dizziness and unsteadiness; the items of the University of California Los Angeles Dizziness Questionnaire assess dizziness and impact on everyday activities. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach alpha, reproducibility by calculating Bland-Altman limits of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients. Associations were estimated by Spearman correlation coefficients. RESULTS:: Patients filled out the DHI-G without problem and found that their self-perceived disabilities were mostly included. Cronbach alpha values for the DHI-G and the functional, physical, and emotional subscales were 0.90, 0.80, 0.71, and 0.82, respectively. The limits of agreement were +/-12.4 points for the total scale (maximum, 100 points). Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.90 to 0.95. The DHI-G correlated moderately with the question assessing functional disability (0.56) and fairly with the questions quantifying dizziness (0.43, 0.35). The DHI-G discriminated significantly between healthy participants and patients. CONCLUSION:: The DHI-G demonstrated good reliability and is recommended as a measure of disability in patients with dizziness and unsteadiness.
机译:要将头晕障碍清单翻译成德语(DHI-G)并调查可靠性,评估加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶头晕问卷和DHI-G的选定项目之间的关联,并比较患者和健康参与者的得分。研究设计::横截面设计。地点:三级眩晕,头晕或平衡障碍中心。患者:一百一十一例眩晕,头晕和不稳定与前庭疾病相关的患者,平均年龄(标准差)为51.5(13.2)岁,有52名健康个体参加。干预措施:十四名患者参加了认知报告; 127名患者在1周内完成了一次或两次问卷调查。主要观察指标:DHI-G评估头晕和不稳定引起的残疾。加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶头晕问卷调查的项目评估头晕及其对日常活动的影响。使用Cronbach alpha估计内部一致性,通过计算Bland-Altman一致性极限和类内相关系数来估计可重复性。通过Spearman相关系数估计关联。结果:患者填写DHI-G没问题,发现他们的自我感觉障碍大部分被包括在内。 DHI-G和功能,身体和情绪分量表的Cronbach alpha值分别为0.90、0.80、0.71和0.82。同意范围的总和为+/- 12.4分(最多100分)。类内相关系数的范围从0.90到0.95。 DHI-G与评估功能障碍的问题(0.56)和量化头晕的问题(0.43,0.35)适度相关。 DHI-G在健康参与者和患者之间有明显区别。结论:DHI-G表现出良好的可靠性,推荐用于晕眩和不稳定患者的残疾测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号